Agriculture
Treating peanut allergy bit by bit
Keeping Bugs Away from Food
Making the most of a meal
Amphibians
Bullfrogs
Newts
Frogs and Toads
Animals
Clone Wars
Spotting the World's Leggiest Animal
Color-Changing Bugs
Behavior
Baby Talk
Talking with Hands
How Much Babies Know
Birds
Hawks
Cassowaries
Geese
Chemistry and Materials
Picture the Smell
Big Machine Reveals Small Worlds
A Diamond Polish for Ancient Tools
Computers
New eyes to scan the skies
Hitting the redo button on evolution
It's a Small E-mail World After All
Dinosaurs and Fossils
Hunting by Sucking, Long Ago
An Ancient Spider's Web
Dinosaur Dig
E Learning Jamaica
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
Earth
Science loses out when ice caps melt
Quick Quake Alerts
Coral Gardens
Environment
Ready, unplug, drive
Flu river
A Change in Time
Finding the Past
Early Maya Writing
Big Woman of the Distant Past
Your inner Neandertal
Fish
Electric Catfish
Tuna
Hammerhead Sharks
Food and Nutrition
Building a Food Pyramid
Chocolate Rules
Turning to Sweets, Fats to Calm the Brain
GSAT English Rules
Whoever vs. Whomever
Order of Adjectives
Subject and Verb Agreement
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
Ministry of Education Announces 82 GSAT Scholarships for 2010
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
10 Common Mistakes When Preparing for the GSAT Math Test
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
GSAT Practice Papers | GSAT Mathematics | Maths
Access denied - Disabled boy aces GSAT
GSAT Mathematics
GSAT Mathematics Quiz, Teaching Math, teaching anxiety
Losing with Heads or Tails
Math and our number sense: PassGSAT.com
Human Body
Surviving Olympic Heat
Electricity's Spark of Life
A Better Flu Shot
Invertebrates
Scorpions
Giant Clam
Snails
Mammals
Otters
Moose
African Zebra
Parents
Choosing a Preschool: What to Consider
What Not to Say to Emerging Readers
Raise a Lifelong Reader by Reading Aloud
Physics
Hold on to your stars, ladies and gentlemen
Echoes of a Stretched Egg
Invisibility Ring
Plants
The algae invasion
When Fungi and Algae Marry
White fuzzy mold not as friendly as it looks
Reptiles
Lizards
Geckos
Caimans
Space and Astronomy
Solving a Sedna Mystery
Return to Space
A Puffy Planetary Puzzle
Technology and Engineering
A Micro-Dose of Your Own Medicine
Musclebots Take Some Steps
Squeezing Oil from Old Wells
The Parts of Speech
Countable and Uncountable Nouns
What is a Preposition?
Adjectives and Adverbs
Transportation
Reach for the Sky
Robots on the Road, Again
How to Fly Like a Bat
Weather
Recipe for a Hurricane
Weekend Weather Really Is Different
A Change in Climate
Add your Article

Hitting the redo button on evolution

People have always wondered why plants and animals are built the way they are. Charles Darwin, an Englishman who lived in the 1800s, was very curious about the shape of life forms, and did lots of experiments to find some answers. He came up with the theory of evolution, which helps explain how life on Earth came to be in its many forms. A big part of Darwin’s evolution theory is a process called natural selection — you might have heard it called “survival of the fittest.” Natural selection says that plants, animals and other life forms that are best suited to their environment survive and have offspring. If the environment changes, organisms whose forms can change, or adapt, best over time to the new conditions have a better chance of surviving. For instance, fish called sticklebacks have spines that keep bigger fish from gulping them down. Sticklebacks usually live in the ocean, where escaping from big fish is a problem, and spineless fish would quickly be gobbled up. But some kinds of sticklebacks live in ponds where there are no other fish to worry about. Instead there are huge insects, such as dragonflies, that can grab sticklebacks by their spines and eat them like you hold a Popsicle by the stick and slurp it up. In that case, having spines is bad. Some sticklebacks that live in these ponds have lost their spines over time. Now the dragonflies have nothing to hold on to, making this spineless fish “fitter” and able to produce more offspring than fish with spines who would get eaten by the dragonflies. Scientists have wondered for a long time whether evolution would work the same way every time. Some think if you borrowed Hermione Granger’s time-turner and went back in time to do a redo of evolution, things would turn out basically the same as they are now. Some details might be different, but in general, evolution would probably make plants and animals that are very similar to the ones alive today. But other scientists don’t agree. They think that if you hit the redo button, a small change somewhere along the line could produce very big changes later. It would be like recording a baseball game and then when you watched it again having one play change that lead to the other team winning. Richard Lenski at Michigan State University in East Lansing is doing experiments with bacteria to find out who is right. In 1988, Lenski lined up 12 flasks at the start of his experiment. In each flask he placed identical bacteria, known as E. coli, and fed all of the bacteria the same food. The bacteria’s food is a liquid that contains vitamins, nutrients and a kind of sugar called glucose. Bacteria that are better at using glucose grow faster. They also make many more copies of themselves (how bacteria reproduce) than bacteria that don’t digest glucose as well. Each day, Lenski randomly takes some of the bacteria and puts them in a new flask containing the same liquid. The remaining bacteria are frozen, which is like hitting the pause button. Scientists can go back later and start the experiment again with the paused, frozen bacteria. By now, the bacteria have made more than 45,000 generations, or groups of organisms born around the same time. By using a dozen different flasks, Lenski was basically setting up 12 different recordings of the same game, pushing “play” at the same time and watching to see if all the games would end the same. For many generations, all of the bacteria in all of the flasks seemed to be playing their games the same. All of the bacteria grew bigger than their ancestors and got better at eating glucose. But then something different happened. The liquid food in the flasks also contains a type of sugar called citrate. E. coli don’t eat citrate. At least most E. coli don’t. But after about 30,000 generations, bacteria in one of the flasks suddenly started to chow down on citrate. “They’ve been eating the main course for thousands of generations,” Lenski says. “They didn’t realize that there was a dessert tray around the corner.” Zachary Blount, a graduate student in Lenski’s lab, replayed the citrate game more than 40 trillion times using the frozen bacteria. He found that the evolution game isn’t played the same every time. Fewer than one in one trillion bacteria make the plays that allow them to end up finding the dessert cart. For now, the citrate-eating bacteria still eat their glucose dinner along with dessert. But maybe with time some of those E. coli will start eating only dessert, says Blount. “It would be amazing,” Blount says. “It would be like teenagers who no longer like to eat pizza — they prefer broccoli.” So who is right — the scientists who think evolution ends the same way each time? Or the ones who think that surprise endings are more likely? Both, says Lenski. In 11 flasks the game seems to be playing out the same, meaning that the first group of scientists is mostly right. But the rare appearance of the citrate eaters means that the group who believes in surprise endings is also correct, he says.

Hitting the redo button on evolution
Hitting the redo button on evolution








Designed and Powered by HBJamaica.com™