Getting the dirt on carbon
Vitamin D-licious Mushrooms
Hungry bug seeks hot meal
Poison Dart Frogs
Tree Frogs
The Secret Lives of Grizzlies
Cannibal Crickets
A Spider's Taste for Blood
Flower family knows its roots
The case of the headless ant
Double take
Carnivorous Birds
Chemistry and Materials
Bang, Sparkle, Burst, and Boom
Sweeeet! The Skinny on Sugar Substitutes
The memory of a material
Hubble trouble doubled
The Shape of the Internet
Batteries built by Viruses
Dinosaurs and Fossils
Fingerprinting Fossils
The Paleontologist and the Three Dinosaurs
Teeny Skull Reveals Ancient Ancestor
E Learning Jamaica
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
Easy Ways to Conserve Water
A Volcano Wakes Up
Earth's Lowly Rumble
Fishing for Fun Takes Toll
Will Climate Change Depose Monarchs?
Ready, unplug, drive
Finding the Past
Childhood's Long History
Your inner Neandertal
Prehistoric Trips to the Dentist
Great White Shark
Food and Nutrition
The mercury in that tuna
How Super Are Superfruits?
Food for Life
GSAT English Rules
Adjectives and Adverbs
Subject and Verb Agreement
Order of Adjectives
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
GSAT Exam Preparation
The Annual GSAT Scholarships
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
GSAT Scholarship
GSAT Practice Papers | GSAT Mathematics | Maths
GSAT Mathematics
Math of the World
Prime Time for Cicadas
GSAT Mathematics Quiz, Teaching Math, teaching anxiety
Human Body
Electricity's Spark of Life
Fighting Off Micro-Invader Epidemics
Foul Play?
Camel Spiders
Little Brown Bats
Raise a Lifelong Reader by Reading Aloud
How children learn
Children and Media
Invisibility Ring
IceCube Science
Echoes of a Stretched Egg
Cactus Goo for Clean Water
Tracking the Sun Improves Plant Pollen
Surprise Visitor
Sea Turtles
Copperhead Snakes
Space and Astronomy
An Icy Blob of Fluff
Solving a Sedna Mystery
A Great Ball of Fire
Technology and Engineering
Sugar Power for Cell Phones
Weaving with Light
Roll-Up Computer Monitors to Go
The Parts of Speech
Countable and Uncountable Nouns
Adjectives and Adverbs
What is a Verb?
Seen on the Science Fair Scene
Tinkering With the Basic Bike
Are Propellers Fin-ished?
Antarctica warms, which threatens penguins
In Antarctica watch the heat (and your step)
Warmest Year on Record
Add your Article

Hitting the redo button on evolution

People have always wondered why plants and animals are built the way they are. Charles Darwin, an Englishman who lived in the 1800s, was very curious about the shape of life forms, and did lots of experiments to find some answers. He came up with the theory of evolution, which helps explain how life on Earth came to be in its many forms. A big part of Darwin’s evolution theory is a process called natural selection — you might have heard it called “survival of the fittest.” Natural selection says that plants, animals and other life forms that are best suited to their environment survive and have offspring. If the environment changes, organisms whose forms can change, or adapt, best over time to the new conditions have a better chance of surviving. For instance, fish called sticklebacks have spines that keep bigger fish from gulping them down. Sticklebacks usually live in the ocean, where escaping from big fish is a problem, and spineless fish would quickly be gobbled up. But some kinds of sticklebacks live in ponds where there are no other fish to worry about. Instead there are huge insects, such as dragonflies, that can grab sticklebacks by their spines and eat them like you hold a Popsicle by the stick and slurp it up. In that case, having spines is bad. Some sticklebacks that live in these ponds have lost their spines over time. Now the dragonflies have nothing to hold on to, making this spineless fish “fitter” and able to produce more offspring than fish with spines who would get eaten by the dragonflies. Scientists have wondered for a long time whether evolution would work the same way every time. Some think if you borrowed Hermione Granger’s time-turner and went back in time to do a redo of evolution, things would turn out basically the same as they are now. Some details might be different, but in general, evolution would probably make plants and animals that are very similar to the ones alive today. But other scientists don’t agree. They think that if you hit the redo button, a small change somewhere along the line could produce very big changes later. It would be like recording a baseball game and then when you watched it again having one play change that lead to the other team winning. Richard Lenski at Michigan State University in East Lansing is doing experiments with bacteria to find out who is right. In 1988, Lenski lined up 12 flasks at the start of his experiment. In each flask he placed identical bacteria, known as E. coli, and fed all of the bacteria the same food. The bacteria’s food is a liquid that contains vitamins, nutrients and a kind of sugar called glucose. Bacteria that are better at using glucose grow faster. They also make many more copies of themselves (how bacteria reproduce) than bacteria that don’t digest glucose as well. Each day, Lenski randomly takes some of the bacteria and puts them in a new flask containing the same liquid. The remaining bacteria are frozen, which is like hitting the pause button. Scientists can go back later and start the experiment again with the paused, frozen bacteria. By now, the bacteria have made more than 45,000 generations, or groups of organisms born around the same time. By using a dozen different flasks, Lenski was basically setting up 12 different recordings of the same game, pushing “play” at the same time and watching to see if all the games would end the same. For many generations, all of the bacteria in all of the flasks seemed to be playing their games the same. All of the bacteria grew bigger than their ancestors and got better at eating glucose. But then something different happened. The liquid food in the flasks also contains a type of sugar called citrate. E. coli don’t eat citrate. At least most E. coli don’t. But after about 30,000 generations, bacteria in one of the flasks suddenly started to chow down on citrate. “They’ve been eating the main course for thousands of generations,” Lenski says. “They didn’t realize that there was a dessert tray around the corner.” Zachary Blount, a graduate student in Lenski’s lab, replayed the citrate game more than 40 trillion times using the frozen bacteria. He found that the evolution game isn’t played the same every time. Fewer than one in one trillion bacteria make the plays that allow them to end up finding the dessert cart. For now, the citrate-eating bacteria still eat their glucose dinner along with dessert. But maybe with time some of those E. coli will start eating only dessert, says Blount. “It would be amazing,” Blount says. “It would be like teenagers who no longer like to eat pizza — they prefer broccoli.” So who is right — the scientists who think evolution ends the same way each time? Or the ones who think that surprise endings are more likely? Both, says Lenski. In 11 flasks the game seems to be playing out the same, meaning that the first group of scientists is mostly right. But the rare appearance of the citrate eaters means that the group who believes in surprise endings is also correct, he says.

Hitting the redo button on evolution
Hitting the redo button on evolution

Designed and Powered by™