Agriculture
New Gene Fights Potato Blight
Watching out for vultures
Got Milk? How?
Amphibians
Frogs and Toads
Salamanders
Toads
Animals
Baboons Listen for Who's Tops
Mating Slows Down Prairie Dogs
Color-Changing Bugs
Behavior
Flower family knows its roots
Listen and Learn
Fear Matters
Birds
Turkeys
Woodpecker
Kiwis
Chemistry and Materials
A Diamond Polish for Ancient Tools
When frog gender flips
Revving Up Green Machines
Computers
Earth from the inside out
Look into My Eyes
A New Look at Saturn's rings
Dinosaurs and Fossils
From Mammoth to Modern Elephant
Digging Dinos
Mammals in the Shadow of Dinosaurs
E Learning Jamaica
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
Earth
A Volcano's Deadly Ash
Shrinking Glaciers
Giving Sharks Safe Homes
Environment
Island Extinctions
Swimming with Sharks and Stingrays
Nanosponges Soak Up Pollutants
Finding the Past
A Long Trek to Asia
Watching deep-space fireworks
Decoding a Beverage Jar
Fish
Nurse Sharks
Carp
Freshwater Fish
Food and Nutrition
Moving Good Fats from Fish to Mice
Food for Life
Recipe for Health
GSAT English Rules
Whoever vs. Whomever
Capitalization Rules
Order of Adjectives
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
Scotiabank Jamaica Foundation Grade Six Achievement Test (GSAT) Scholarships
Mastering The GSAT Exam
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
Access denied - Disabled boy aces GSAT
GSAT Practice Papers | GSAT Mathematics | Maths
GSAT Mathematics
It's a Math World for Animals
Detecting True Art
Math and our number sense: PassGSAT.com
Human Body
Cell Phones and Possible Health Hazards
Surviving Olympic Heat
Walking to Exercise the Brain
Invertebrates
Bedbugs
Millipedes
Sea Urchin
Mammals
Pitbulls
Koalas
Hoofed Mammals
Parents
Children and Media
Choosing a Preschool: What to Consider
Raise a Lifelong Reader by Reading Aloud
Physics
Extra Strings for New Sounds
The Pressure of Scuba Diving
Strange Universe: The Stuff of Darkness
Plants
Nature's Alphabet
Underwater Jungles
Pumping Up Poison Ivy
Reptiles
Crocodilians
Chameleons
Pythons
Space and Astronomy
A Galaxy Far, Far, Far Away
Return to Space
Planets on the Edge
Technology and Engineering
Slip Sliming Away
Are Propellers Fin-ished?
Reach for the Sky
The Parts of Speech
What is a Noun
What is a Verb?
Pronouns
Transportation
Robots on a Rocky Road
How to Fly Like a Bat
Are Propellers Fin-ished?
Weather
Catching Some Rays
Earth's Poles in Peril
Arctic Melt
Add your Article

Hitting the redo button on evolution

People have always wondered why plants and animals are built the way they are. Charles Darwin, an Englishman who lived in the 1800s, was very curious about the shape of life forms, and did lots of experiments to find some answers. He came up with the theory of evolution, which helps explain how life on Earth came to be in its many forms. A big part of Darwin’s evolution theory is a process called natural selection — you might have heard it called “survival of the fittest.” Natural selection says that plants, animals and other life forms that are best suited to their environment survive and have offspring. If the environment changes, organisms whose forms can change, or adapt, best over time to the new conditions have a better chance of surviving. For instance, fish called sticklebacks have spines that keep bigger fish from gulping them down. Sticklebacks usually live in the ocean, where escaping from big fish is a problem, and spineless fish would quickly be gobbled up. But some kinds of sticklebacks live in ponds where there are no other fish to worry about. Instead there are huge insects, such as dragonflies, that can grab sticklebacks by their spines and eat them like you hold a Popsicle by the stick and slurp it up. In that case, having spines is bad. Some sticklebacks that live in these ponds have lost their spines over time. Now the dragonflies have nothing to hold on to, making this spineless fish “fitter” and able to produce more offspring than fish with spines who would get eaten by the dragonflies. Scientists have wondered for a long time whether evolution would work the same way every time. Some think if you borrowed Hermione Granger’s time-turner and went back in time to do a redo of evolution, things would turn out basically the same as they are now. Some details might be different, but in general, evolution would probably make plants and animals that are very similar to the ones alive today. But other scientists don’t agree. They think that if you hit the redo button, a small change somewhere along the line could produce very big changes later. It would be like recording a baseball game and then when you watched it again having one play change that lead to the other team winning. Richard Lenski at Michigan State University in East Lansing is doing experiments with bacteria to find out who is right. In 1988, Lenski lined up 12 flasks at the start of his experiment. In each flask he placed identical bacteria, known as E. coli, and fed all of the bacteria the same food. The bacteria’s food is a liquid that contains vitamins, nutrients and a kind of sugar called glucose. Bacteria that are better at using glucose grow faster. They also make many more copies of themselves (how bacteria reproduce) than bacteria that don’t digest glucose as well. Each day, Lenski randomly takes some of the bacteria and puts them in a new flask containing the same liquid. The remaining bacteria are frozen, which is like hitting the pause button. Scientists can go back later and start the experiment again with the paused, frozen bacteria. By now, the bacteria have made more than 45,000 generations, or groups of organisms born around the same time. By using a dozen different flasks, Lenski was basically setting up 12 different recordings of the same game, pushing “play” at the same time and watching to see if all the games would end the same. For many generations, all of the bacteria in all of the flasks seemed to be playing their games the same. All of the bacteria grew bigger than their ancestors and got better at eating glucose. But then something different happened. The liquid food in the flasks also contains a type of sugar called citrate. E. coli don’t eat citrate. At least most E. coli don’t. But after about 30,000 generations, bacteria in one of the flasks suddenly started to chow down on citrate. “They’ve been eating the main course for thousands of generations,” Lenski says. “They didn’t realize that there was a dessert tray around the corner.” Zachary Blount, a graduate student in Lenski’s lab, replayed the citrate game more than 40 trillion times using the frozen bacteria. He found that the evolution game isn’t played the same every time. Fewer than one in one trillion bacteria make the plays that allow them to end up finding the dessert cart. For now, the citrate-eating bacteria still eat their glucose dinner along with dessert. But maybe with time some of those E. coli will start eating only dessert, says Blount. “It would be amazing,” Blount says. “It would be like teenagers who no longer like to eat pizza — they prefer broccoli.” So who is right — the scientists who think evolution ends the same way each time? Or the ones who think that surprise endings are more likely? Both, says Lenski. In 11 flasks the game seems to be playing out the same, meaning that the first group of scientists is mostly right. But the rare appearance of the citrate eaters means that the group who believes in surprise endings is also correct, he says.

Hitting the redo button on evolution
Hitting the redo button on evolution








Designed and Powered by HBJamaica.com™