Agriculture
Microbes at the Gas Pump
New Gene Fights Potato Blight
Watching out for vultures
Amphibians
Tree Frogs
Salamanders
Poison Dart Frogs
Animals
A Butterfly's New Green Glow
Putting a Mouse on Pause
How to Fly Like a Bat
Behavior
A Recipe for Happiness
Island of Hope
Babies Prove Sound Learners
Birds
Condors
Swans
Owls
Chemistry and Materials
Smelly Traps for Lampreys
The Taste of Bubbles
Lighting goes digital
Computers
Small but WISE
A New Look at Saturn's rings
Programming with Alice
Dinosaurs and Fossils
Winged Insects May Go Way Back
Have shell, will travel
Digging Dinos
E Learning Jamaica
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
Earth
Deep History
Easy Ways to Conserve Water
Quick Quake Alerts
Environment
Flu river
The Birds are Falling
Out in the Cold
Finding the Past
A Long Haul
Stone Age Sole Survivors
Unearthing Ancient Astronomy
Fish
Megamouth Sharks
Mahi-Mahi
Sharks
Food and Nutrition
Recipe for Health
Healing Honey
Strong Bones for Life
GSAT English Rules
Capitalization Rules
Finding Subjects and Verbs
Problems with Prepositions
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
Scotiabank Jamaica Foundation Grade Six Achievement Test (GSAT) Scholarships
10 Common Mistakes When Preparing for the GSAT Math Test
Tarrant High overcoming the odds
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
42,000 students will sit for the GSAT Exam in two weeks
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
GSAT Practice Papers | GSAT Mathematics | Maths
GSAT Mathematics
GSAT Mathematics Quiz, Teaching Math, teaching anxiety
Math of the World
How to Slice a Cake Fairly
Human Body
A Long Trek to Asia
Attacking Asthma
Germ Zapper
Invertebrates
Clams
Praying Mantis
Earthworms
Mammals
Hoofed Mammals
Walrus
Quolls
Parents
How children learn
The Surprising Meaning and Benefits of Nursery Rhymes
Raise a Lifelong Reader by Reading Aloud
Physics
Road Bumps
IceCube Science
Strange Universe: The Stuff of Darkness
Plants
Surprise Visitor
Farms sprout in cities
Plants Travel Wind Highways
Reptiles
Reptiles
Rattlesnakes
Crocodilians
Space and Astronomy
Ready, Set, Supernova
Cool as a Jupiter
Rover Makes Splash on Mars
Technology and Engineering
Supersuits for Superheroes
A Clean Getaway
Model Plane Flies the Atlantic
The Parts of Speech
Adjectives and Adverbs
Countable and Uncountable Nouns
Problems with Prepositions
Transportation
Morphing a Wing to Save Fuel
Flying the Hyper Skies
Where rivers run uphill
Weather
Warmest Year on Record
Where rivers run uphill
Either Martians or Mars has gas
Add your Article

Hitting the redo button on evolution

People have always wondered why plants and animals are built the way they are. Charles Darwin, an Englishman who lived in the 1800s, was very curious about the shape of life forms, and did lots of experiments to find some answers. He came up with the theory of evolution, which helps explain how life on Earth came to be in its many forms. A big part of Darwin’s evolution theory is a process called natural selection — you might have heard it called “survival of the fittest.” Natural selection says that plants, animals and other life forms that are best suited to their environment survive and have offspring. If the environment changes, organisms whose forms can change, or adapt, best over time to the new conditions have a better chance of surviving. For instance, fish called sticklebacks have spines that keep bigger fish from gulping them down. Sticklebacks usually live in the ocean, where escaping from big fish is a problem, and spineless fish would quickly be gobbled up. But some kinds of sticklebacks live in ponds where there are no other fish to worry about. Instead there are huge insects, such as dragonflies, that can grab sticklebacks by their spines and eat them like you hold a Popsicle by the stick and slurp it up. In that case, having spines is bad. Some sticklebacks that live in these ponds have lost their spines over time. Now the dragonflies have nothing to hold on to, making this spineless fish “fitter” and able to produce more offspring than fish with spines who would get eaten by the dragonflies. Scientists have wondered for a long time whether evolution would work the same way every time. Some think if you borrowed Hermione Granger’s time-turner and went back in time to do a redo of evolution, things would turn out basically the same as they are now. Some details might be different, but in general, evolution would probably make plants and animals that are very similar to the ones alive today. But other scientists don’t agree. They think that if you hit the redo button, a small change somewhere along the line could produce very big changes later. It would be like recording a baseball game and then when you watched it again having one play change that lead to the other team winning. Richard Lenski at Michigan State University in East Lansing is doing experiments with bacteria to find out who is right. In 1988, Lenski lined up 12 flasks at the start of his experiment. In each flask he placed identical bacteria, known as E. coli, and fed all of the bacteria the same food. The bacteria’s food is a liquid that contains vitamins, nutrients and a kind of sugar called glucose. Bacteria that are better at using glucose grow faster. They also make many more copies of themselves (how bacteria reproduce) than bacteria that don’t digest glucose as well. Each day, Lenski randomly takes some of the bacteria and puts them in a new flask containing the same liquid. The remaining bacteria are frozen, which is like hitting the pause button. Scientists can go back later and start the experiment again with the paused, frozen bacteria. By now, the bacteria have made more than 45,000 generations, or groups of organisms born around the same time. By using a dozen different flasks, Lenski was basically setting up 12 different recordings of the same game, pushing “play” at the same time and watching to see if all the games would end the same. For many generations, all of the bacteria in all of the flasks seemed to be playing their games the same. All of the bacteria grew bigger than their ancestors and got better at eating glucose. But then something different happened. The liquid food in the flasks also contains a type of sugar called citrate. E. coli don’t eat citrate. At least most E. coli don’t. But after about 30,000 generations, bacteria in one of the flasks suddenly started to chow down on citrate. “They’ve been eating the main course for thousands of generations,” Lenski says. “They didn’t realize that there was a dessert tray around the corner.” Zachary Blount, a graduate student in Lenski’s lab, replayed the citrate game more than 40 trillion times using the frozen bacteria. He found that the evolution game isn’t played the same every time. Fewer than one in one trillion bacteria make the plays that allow them to end up finding the dessert cart. For now, the citrate-eating bacteria still eat their glucose dinner along with dessert. But maybe with time some of those E. coli will start eating only dessert, says Blount. “It would be amazing,” Blount says. “It would be like teenagers who no longer like to eat pizza — they prefer broccoli.” So who is right — the scientists who think evolution ends the same way each time? Or the ones who think that surprise endings are more likely? Both, says Lenski. In 11 flasks the game seems to be playing out the same, meaning that the first group of scientists is mostly right. But the rare appearance of the citrate eaters means that the group who believes in surprise endings is also correct, he says.

Hitting the redo button on evolution
Hitting the redo button on evolution








Designed and Powered by HBJamaica.com™