Agriculture
Growing Healthier Tomato Plants
Got Milk? How?
Getting the dirt on carbon
Amphibians
Poison Dart Frogs
Salamanders and Newts
Tree Frogs
Animals
Feeding School for Meerkats
Vampire Bats on the Run
Monkey Math
Behavior
Surprise Visitor
Swedish Rhapsody
A Grim Future for Some Killer Whales
Birds
Emus
Kingfishers
Storks
Chemistry and Materials
Batteries built by Viruses
Watching out for vultures
A Framework for Growing Bone
Computers
Supersonic Splash
New eyes to scan the skies
Graphene's superstrength
Dinosaurs and Fossils
An Ancient Spider's Web
Fossil Fly from Antarctica
A Dino King's Ancestor
E Learning Jamaica
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
Earth
Less Mixing Can Affect Lake's Ecosystem
Warmest Year on Record
Snowflakes and Avalanches
Environment
A Change in Time
The Wolf and the Cow
Bald Eagles Forever
Finding the Past
Chicken of the Sea
Digging Up Stone Age Art
If Only Bones Could Speak
Fish
Parrotfish
A Grim Future for Some Killer Whales
Pygmy Sharks
Food and Nutrition
Chocolate Rules
Moving Good Fats from Fish to Mice
The mercury in that tuna
GSAT English Rules
Problems with Prepositions
Pronouns
Capitalization Rules
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
How are students placed after passing the GSAT exam
March 21-22, 2013: Over 43,000 students will take the GSAT Exam
42,000 students will sit for the GSAT Exam in two weeks
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
Access denied - Disabled boy aces GSAT
GSAT Mathematics
42,000 students will sit for the GSAT Exam in two weeks
Losing with Heads or Tails
Math and our number sense: PassGSAT.com
Human Body
Surviving Olympic Heat
Gut Germs to the Rescue
Opening a Channel for Tasting Salt
Invertebrates
Lice
Corals
Crustaceans
Mammals
Manxes
Blue Bear
Skunks
Parents
What Not to Say to Emerging Readers
Choosing a Preschool: What to Consider
How children learn
Physics
Gaining a Swift Lift
Powering Ball Lightning
Project Music
Plants
Pumping Up Poison Ivy
Seeds of the Future
Plants Travel Wind Highways
Reptiles
Asp
Copperhead Snakes
Geckos
Space and Astronomy
A Smashing Display
Phantom Energy and the Big Rip
Pluto, plutoid: What's in a name?
Technology and Engineering
A Micro-Dose of Your Own Medicine
Weaving with Light
Slip Sliming Away
The Parts of Speech
Adjectives and Adverbs
What is a Noun
What is a Preposition?
Transportation
Reach for the Sky
Middle school science adventures
Tinkering With the Basic Bike
Weather
Arctic Melt
Recipe for a Hurricane
Catching Some Rays
Add your Article

Hitting the redo button on evolution

People have always wondered why plants and animals are built the way they are. Charles Darwin, an Englishman who lived in the 1800s, was very curious about the shape of life forms, and did lots of experiments to find some answers. He came up with the theory of evolution, which helps explain how life on Earth came to be in its many forms. A big part of Darwin’s evolution theory is a process called natural selection — you might have heard it called “survival of the fittest.” Natural selection says that plants, animals and other life forms that are best suited to their environment survive and have offspring. If the environment changes, organisms whose forms can change, or adapt, best over time to the new conditions have a better chance of surviving. For instance, fish called sticklebacks have spines that keep bigger fish from gulping them down. Sticklebacks usually live in the ocean, where escaping from big fish is a problem, and spineless fish would quickly be gobbled up. But some kinds of sticklebacks live in ponds where there are no other fish to worry about. Instead there are huge insects, such as dragonflies, that can grab sticklebacks by their spines and eat them like you hold a Popsicle by the stick and slurp it up. In that case, having spines is bad. Some sticklebacks that live in these ponds have lost their spines over time. Now the dragonflies have nothing to hold on to, making this spineless fish “fitter” and able to produce more offspring than fish with spines who would get eaten by the dragonflies. Scientists have wondered for a long time whether evolution would work the same way every time. Some think if you borrowed Hermione Granger’s time-turner and went back in time to do a redo of evolution, things would turn out basically the same as they are now. Some details might be different, but in general, evolution would probably make plants and animals that are very similar to the ones alive today. But other scientists don’t agree. They think that if you hit the redo button, a small change somewhere along the line could produce very big changes later. It would be like recording a baseball game and then when you watched it again having one play change that lead to the other team winning. Richard Lenski at Michigan State University in East Lansing is doing experiments with bacteria to find out who is right. In 1988, Lenski lined up 12 flasks at the start of his experiment. In each flask he placed identical bacteria, known as E. coli, and fed all of the bacteria the same food. The bacteria’s food is a liquid that contains vitamins, nutrients and a kind of sugar called glucose. Bacteria that are better at using glucose grow faster. They also make many more copies of themselves (how bacteria reproduce) than bacteria that don’t digest glucose as well. Each day, Lenski randomly takes some of the bacteria and puts them in a new flask containing the same liquid. The remaining bacteria are frozen, which is like hitting the pause button. Scientists can go back later and start the experiment again with the paused, frozen bacteria. By now, the bacteria have made more than 45,000 generations, or groups of organisms born around the same time. By using a dozen different flasks, Lenski was basically setting up 12 different recordings of the same game, pushing “play” at the same time and watching to see if all the games would end the same. For many generations, all of the bacteria in all of the flasks seemed to be playing their games the same. All of the bacteria grew bigger than their ancestors and got better at eating glucose. But then something different happened. The liquid food in the flasks also contains a type of sugar called citrate. E. coli don’t eat citrate. At least most E. coli don’t. But after about 30,000 generations, bacteria in one of the flasks suddenly started to chow down on citrate. “They’ve been eating the main course for thousands of generations,” Lenski says. “They didn’t realize that there was a dessert tray around the corner.” Zachary Blount, a graduate student in Lenski’s lab, replayed the citrate game more than 40 trillion times using the frozen bacteria. He found that the evolution game isn’t played the same every time. Fewer than one in one trillion bacteria make the plays that allow them to end up finding the dessert cart. For now, the citrate-eating bacteria still eat their glucose dinner along with dessert. But maybe with time some of those E. coli will start eating only dessert, says Blount. “It would be amazing,” Blount says. “It would be like teenagers who no longer like to eat pizza — they prefer broccoli.” So who is right — the scientists who think evolution ends the same way each time? Or the ones who think that surprise endings are more likely? Both, says Lenski. In 11 flasks the game seems to be playing out the same, meaning that the first group of scientists is mostly right. But the rare appearance of the citrate eaters means that the group who believes in surprise endings is also correct, he says.

Hitting the redo button on evolution
Hitting the redo button on evolution








Designed and Powered by HBJamaica.com™