Watching out for vultures
Cleaning Up Fish Farms
Fast-flying fungal spores
Tree Frogs
Frogs and Toads
Jay Watch
Hearing Whales
Baboons Listen for Who's Tops
Baby Number Whizzes
Contemplating thought
Swedish Rhapsody
Carnivorous Birds
Chemistry and Materials
Earth-Friendly Fabrics
The newest superheavy in town
Batteries built by Viruses
A Light Delay
New twists for phantom limbs
Secrets of an Ancient Computer
Dinosaurs and Fossils
Dinosaur Dig
Fossil Fly from Antarctica
Some Dinos Dined on Grass
E Learning Jamaica
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
Ancient Heights
Undersea Vent System Active for Ages
Island of Hope
Will Climate Change Depose Monarchs?
Flu river
Spotty Survival
Finding the Past
Little People Cause Big Surprise
A Volcano's Deadly Ash
Watching deep-space fireworks
Electric Catfish
Food and Nutrition
Building a Food Pyramid
A Taste for Cheese
Chocolate Rules
GSAT English Rules
Adjectives and Adverbs
Order of Adjectives
Problems with Prepositions
GSAT Exam Preparation Jamaica
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
Ministry of Education Announces 82 GSAT Scholarships for 2010
GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
Results of GSAT are in schools this week
2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
GSAT Mathematics
Play for Science
42,000 students will sit for the GSAT Exam in two weeks
Math Naturals
Human Body
Surviving Olympic Heat
Nature's Medicines
Sun Screen
German Shepherds
The Surprising Meaning and Benefits of Nursery Rhymes
How children learn
Raise a Lifelong Reader by Reading Aloud
Dreams of Floating in Space
Speedy stars
Hold on to your stars, ladies and gentlemen
White fuzzy mold not as friendly as it looks
Getting the dirt on carbon
Stalking Plants by Scent
Black Mamba
Space and Astronomy
Holes in Martian moon mystery
Galaxies Divide Sharply Along Color Lines
A Planet from the Early Universe
Technology and Engineering
Bionic Bacteria
Squeezing Oil from Old Wells
Algae Motors
The Parts of Speech
What is a Verb?
What is a Noun
Middle school science adventures
Morphing a Wing to Save Fuel
Flying the Hyper Skies
Recipe for a Hurricane
Arctic Melt
Science loses out when ice caps melt
Add your Article

Detecting True Art

Real or fake? In the world of art, that can be an expensive question. Famous paintings by classic artists can sell for millions of dollars. To make a quick buck, people sometimes try to sell paintings that are imitations of the real thing. When the forgeries are done well, spotting them can be a major challenge, even for experts. Now, researchers say they have found a new way to tell the real from the fake—using mathematics. The researchers start with a digital image. They use a mathematical technique, known as wavelet decomposition, that breaks this image down into a collection of smaller, more-basic images. This method is especially useful for analyzing textures. In a photograph, it can readily detect the difference between the smooth appearance of a blue sky and the ruffled surface of a grassy field, for example. In a painting, it can capture the texture of an artist's brush strokes. When an imitator tries to copy a master artist, his or her brush strokes would probably be different. "A master might have smooth, consistent strokes, say, while an imitator is jerky," says Hany Farid, one of the researchers. Farid is a computer scientist at Dartmouth College in Hanover, N.H. The researchers used wavelet decomposition and other statistical measures to analyze eight drawings by a 16th-century artist named Pieter Brueghel the Elder. They then compared the data obtained from these drawings with measurements of five imitations revealed to be false just 10 years ago. The team found that the genuine Brueghel drawings all had similar patterns. By the same measure, the fakes were different from each other and from the true drawings. The researchers also studied a painting called "Virgin and Child with Saints." It was created near the beginning of the 16th century in the studio of the Italian artist Pietro Perugino. Their method suggested that at least four artists actually produced the painting. Showing that the method works for two artists is not enough to conclude that it will work across the board. Still, art historians are optimistic. Mathematics may yet earn a place in an expert's toolkit for detecting forgeries.—E. Sohn

Detecting True Art
Detecting True Art

Designed and Powered by™