Add your Article
- Computers
- Hitting the redo button on evolution
- The solar system's biggest junkyard
- A Classroom of the Mind
- E Learning Jamaica
- Results of GSAT are in schools this week
- 2014 GSAT Results for Jamaican Kids
- E Learning in Jamaica WIN PRIZES and try our Fun Animated Games
- GSAT Exams Jamaica Scholarships
- GSAT stars reap scholarship glory
- 42,000 students will sit for the GSAT Exam in two weeks
- Access denied - Disabled boy aces GSAT
- GSAT Mathematics
- 10 Common Mistakes When Preparing for the GSAT Math Test
- Math Naturals
- Deep-space dancers
- Parents
- Children and Media
- Choosing a Preschool: What to Consider
- The Surprising Meaning and Benefits of Nursery Rhymes
A Newspaper's Hidden Cost
Published: 07/01/2010
It’s a morning ritual for millions of people: Wake up. Have breakfast. Read the paper.
This simple, groggy habit is taking its toll on the environment, say researchers from the University of California, Berkeley. In a recent study, they found that reading the news on a handheld computer would be much better for the planet than reading the paper version.
For their study, the researchers focused on the New York Times, which has more subscribers per 7-day week than any other newspaper in the United States. About 1.2 million subscribers get it on weekdays, and 1.7 million get the Sunday edition.
Producing the paper uses up a lot of energy and resources, the researchers found. One year’s worth of the New York Times weighs about 236 kilograms. It takes about 22,700 liters of water each year to make the paper for just one reader. The same processes release about 660 kilograms of carbon dioxide, a gas that contributes to global warming. Printing and transporting the newspaper release even more.
The researchers found that, just by trying to stay informed, a single daily reader in Berkeley contributes 270 kilograms of extra carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year.
The New York Times also happens to be available in electronic form. People can download it through a wireless signal onto a portable little computer called a personal digital assistant (PDA), for example.
The researchers added up all of the energy that it takes to make a PDA and its batteries, recharge the batteries, and download the New York Times. They found that an individual reader using a PDA would be responsible for producing just 5 kilograms of carbon dioxide.
Clearly, it would be far more efficient if everyone took PDAs to the breakfast table instead of newspapers.
The hard part will be convincing people to get cozy with computers, when the act of turning pages or scanning the comics can be so enjoyable. And, even though it’s okay to spill cereal on the paper, a splash of juice on the PDA could be disastrous!—E. Sohn
A Newspaper's Hidden Cost
